Invite your colleagues
And receive 1 week of complimentary premium membership
Upcoming Events (0)
ORGANIZE A MEETING OR EVENT
And earn up to €300 per participant.
Sub Circles (0)
No sub circles for Hedge Funds
Research Topics (0)
No research topics
Private equity, hedge funds object to U.S. carried-interest tax hike proposal
Private equity and hedge funds cautioned on Thursday that a proposed U.S. tax increase on carried-interest income could potentially hurt small businesses and big investors, such as endowments, foundations and pension funds. Carried interest refers to a longstanding Wall Street tax break that let many private equity and hedge fund financiers pay the lower capital gains tax rate on much of their income, instead of the higher income tax rate paid by wage-earners. 'Over 74% of private equity investment went to small businesses last year. As small business owners face rising costs and our economy faces serious headwinds, Washington should not move forward with a new tax on the private capital that is helping local employers survive and grow,' Drew Maloney, president and chief executive of the American Investment Council. 'It is crucial Congress avoids proposals that harm the ability of pensions, foundations, and endowments to benefit from high value, long-term investments that create opportunity for millions of Americans,' said Bryan Corbett, MFA president and CEO....
Mark shared this article 2y
Engine No. 1's big win over Exxon shows activist hedge funds joining fight against climate change
Exxon Mobil Corp. has been fending off a so-called proxy fight from a hedge fund known as Engine No. 1, which blames the energy giant’s poor performance in recent years on its failure to transition to a “decarbonizing world.” In a May 26, 2021 vote, Exxon shareholders approved at least two of the four board members Engine No. 1 nominated, dealing a major blow to the oil company. The vote is ongoing, and more of the hedge fund’s nominees may also soon be appointed. While its focus has been on shareholder value, Engine No. 1 says it was also doing this to save the planet from the ravages of climate change. It has been pushing for a commitment from Exxon to carbon neutrality by 2050. As business sustainability scholars, we can’t recall another time that an energy company’s shareholder – particularly a hedge fund – has been so effective and forceful in showing how a company’s failure to take on climate change has eroded shareholder value. That’s why we believe this vote marks a turning point for investors, who are well placed to nudge companies toward more sustainable business practices....
Frank recommends this posting 3y
How Diverse Is Your Board, Really?
Posted by Mark Field from HBR in Hedge Funds
Influenced by state legislation as well as the efforts of institutional investors and other diversity advocates, companies have been adding more diverse directors to their boards than ever before. In 2019, a record 59 percent of the directors added to the boards of S&P 500 companies were women or were men belonging to a racial or ethnic minority group. Now, as companies seek to navigate numerous issues few have faced before, including a worldwide pandemic, a lingering trade war, changing consumer demands, and widespread protests regarding racial inequality, even more may be seeking to increase their diversity. But what characteristics should boards look for when adding directors to improve gender, racial, and ethnic diversity to ensure that these new directors also enhance diversity in the boardroom from a practical perspective?...
Mark shared this article 4y
When an Activist Hedge Fund Thinks a Company’s Salaries Are Too High, Who’s Right?
Posted by Mark Field from HBR in Hedge Funds
The 359th richest man in the United States has decided that the workers with the highest salaries in Silicon Valley need to get by with less. At least, that’s one way of looking at Elliott Management’s campaign to shake things up at Juniper Networks. The hedge fund founded and run by billionaire Paul Singer just announced that it now owns 6.2% of the networking equipment maker and called out Juniper’s pay ranking as an indication the company’s costs are too high and its R&D spending “excessive.”...
Mark shared this article 4y