Posted by Alumni from The Conversation
January 31, 2025
This choice comes to mind when I think about the 47th president's frequent comments recently about incorporating Greenland and Canada into the United States. A few cases in point: Before delivering an inaugural address in which he vaguely but forcefully expressed a desire for the U.S. to expand its territory, Trump raised the issue on a confrontational phone call with the prime minister of Denmark, which handles Greenland's international affairs. More recently, he spoke of Canada becoming a U.S. state to reporters on Air Force One. But as an economic historian, I believe that thought experiments can be a useful way of understanding truths about the world. And one such truth is that Greenland and Canada play a key role in the global economy. If the U.S. were to absorb either or both, it would be a strategic, economic and political game changer. So, for a moment, let's take Trump both seriously and literally. Below, I've laid out some very rough measures of how a reconstituted... learn more

WE USE COOKIES TO ENHANCE YOUR EXPERIENCE
Unicircles uses cookies to personalize content, provide certain advanced features, and to analyze traffic. Per our privacy policy, we WILL NOT share information about your use of our site with social media, advertising, or analytics companies. If you continue using Unicircles by clicking below link, you agree to our use of Cookies while using Unicircles.
I AGREELearn more
x