Best two reviews:
1) The Guardian- Clayton brilliantly uses slow dissolves to create ghostly superimpositions, and the harmless squeals of bath-time fun, or squeakings of a pencil, suggest uncanny screams. (Rating: 100) Read Full Review >
2) The Telegraph- The film thrives on unsettling images of overgrowth and rot, such as the dead flower that drops at Kerr’s touch, and the beetle that crawls obscenely out of the mouth of a cherub statue. (Rating: 100) Read Full Review >
Worst two reviews:
15) - Mr. Clayton and Miss Kerr have neglected to interpret the tale and character with sufficient incisiveness and candor to give us a first-rate horror or psychological film. But they've given us one that still has interest and sends some formidable chills down the spine. (Rating: 60) Read Full Review >
16) - Clayton lacks the Jamesian temper, and his film is finally more indecisive than ambiguous. Too much Freud and too little thought. (Rating: 50) Read Full Review >
1) The Guardian- Clayton brilliantly uses slow dissolves to create ghostly superimpositions, and the harmless squeals of bath-time fun, or squeakings of a pencil, suggest uncanny screams. (Rating: 100) Read Full Review >
2) The Telegraph- The film thrives on unsettling images of overgrowth and rot, such as the dead flower that drops at Kerr’s touch, and the beetle that crawls obscenely out of the mouth of a cherub statue. (Rating: 100) Read Full Review >
Worst two reviews:
15) - Mr. Clayton and Miss Kerr have neglected to interpret the tale and character with sufficient incisiveness and candor to give us a first-rate horror or psychological film. But they've given us one that still has interest and sends some formidable chills down the spine. (Rating: 60) Read Full Review >
16) - Clayton lacks the Jamesian temper, and his film is finally more indecisive than ambiguous. Too much Freud and too little thought. (Rating: 50) Read Full Review >
Alumni
2y
Ratings & Reviews
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE