Best two reviews:
1) Chicago Sun-Times - Stone and his editors, Joe Hutshing and Pietro Scalia, have somehow triumphed over the tumult of material here and made it work - made it grip and disturb us. (Rating: 100) Read Full Review >
2) San Francisco Chronicle - Director Oliver Stone has fashioned in JFK a riveting, dramatic and disturbing look at one of the great whodunits of history. [20 Dec 1991] (Rating: 100) Read Full Review >
Worst two reviews:
21) The Globe and Mail (Toronto) - A three-hour oration, rambling and familiar and repetitive, during which director Oliver Stone uses the assassination of John Kennedy as an elaborate pretext for delivering a dull sermon. [20 Dec 1991] (Rating: 25) Read Full Review >
22) Chicago Reader - Stone's all-purpose conspiracy theory, built like a house of cards, rivals "Mississippi Burning" in its sheer crudeness and contempt for the audience. (Rating: 20) Read Full Review >
1) Chicago Sun-Times - Stone and his editors, Joe Hutshing and Pietro Scalia, have somehow triumphed over the tumult of material here and made it work - made it grip and disturb us. (Rating: 100) Read Full Review >
2) San Francisco Chronicle - Director Oliver Stone has fashioned in JFK a riveting, dramatic and disturbing look at one of the great whodunits of history. [20 Dec 1991] (Rating: 100) Read Full Review >
Worst two reviews:
21) The Globe and Mail (Toronto) - A three-hour oration, rambling and familiar and repetitive, during which director Oliver Stone uses the assassination of John Kennedy as an elaborate pretext for delivering a dull sermon. [20 Dec 1991] (Rating: 25) Read Full Review >
22) Chicago Reader - Stone's all-purpose conspiracy theory, built like a house of cards, rivals "Mississippi Burning" in its sheer crudeness and contempt for the audience. (Rating: 20) Read Full Review >
Alumni
5y
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE